Review



elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap  (brain products gmbh)


Bioz Manufacturer Symbol brain products gmbh manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    brain products gmbh elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap
    Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the <t>electrode</t> sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.
    Elastic Cap With 59 Active Electrodes Acticap, supplied by brain products gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elastic+cap+with+59+active+electrodes+acticap/62+active+electrode+recording+system+acticap/pmc06372529-79-6-8
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Attention to Unseen Stimuli in Hemianopic Patients. A Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Study"

    Article Title: Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Attention to Unseen Stimuli in Hemianopic Patients. A Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Study

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychology

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00198

    Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Techniques Used: Comparison

    Between-subjects attentional effect. Permutation t -test comparisons of the effect of attention (i.e., attended – unattended) between healthy participants and hemianopic patients in blind (upper row) and sighted (lower row) hemifields. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Between-subjects attentional effect. Permutation t -test comparisons of the effect of attention (i.e., attended – unattended) between healthy participants and hemianopic patients in blind (upper row) and sighted (lower row) hemifields. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Techniques Used: Comparison

    Related Articles

    Comparison:

    Article Title: Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Attention to Unseen Stimuli in Hemianopic Patients. A Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Study
    Article Snippet: was recorded during the performance of the task. .. An elastic cap with 59 active electrodes (ActiCap, Brain Products GmbH, Munich Germany) placed according to the 10-10 International System was used. .. An acquisition system with two BrainAmp amplifiers a



    Similar Products

    elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap  (brain products gmbh)
    90
    brain products gmbh elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap
    Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the <t>electrode</t> sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.
    Elastic Cap With 59 Active Electrodes Acticap, supplied by brain products gmbh, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/elastic+cap+with+59+active+electrodes+acticap/62+active+electrode+recording+system+acticap/pmc06372529-79-6-8
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elastic cap with 59 active electrodes acticap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychology

    Article Title: Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Attention to Unseen Stimuli in Hemianopic Patients. A Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Study

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00198

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Within-subjects attention effect. Permutation t -test comparisons between attended (first column) and unattended (second column) for (A) healthy participants and (B) hemianopic patients. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Article Snippet: An elastic cap with 59 active electrodes (ActiCap, Brain Products GmbH, Munich Germany) placed according to the 10-10 International System was used.

    Techniques: Comparison

    Between-subjects attentional effect. Permutation t -test comparisons of the effect of attention (i.e., attended – unattended) between healthy participants and hemianopic patients in blind (upper row) and sighted (lower row) hemifields. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Journal: Frontiers in Psychology

    Article Title: Neural Correlates of Visuospatial Attention to Unseen Stimuli in Hemianopic Patients. A Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Study

    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00198

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Between-subjects attentional effect. Permutation t -test comparisons of the effect of attention (i.e., attended – unattended) between healthy participants and hemianopic patients in blind (upper row) and sighted (lower row) hemifields. Topographical maps in columns 1 and 2 represent the power of frequency (μV 2 ) for each condition attended and unattended, respectively. Maps in the 3rd column represent t values of the comparison between attended and unattended conditions; blue points indicate the electrode sites where the power of frequency in the attended condition was significantly higher than in the unattended condition after the FDR correction calculated separately for each comparison. The maximum p value accepted after FDR correction is indicated in the tittle of the 3rd column.

    Article Snippet: An elastic cap with 59 active electrodes (ActiCap, Brain Products GmbH, Munich Germany) placed according to the 10-10 International System was used.

    Techniques: Comparison